Re: <FIG> implies <P>?

Paul Prescod (
Thu, 13 Jul 1995 14:02:22 -0400 (EDT)

From: Paul Prescod <>
Message-Id: <>
Subject: Re: <FIG> implies <P>?
To: (Daniel W. Connolly)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 14:02:22 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <> from "Daniel W. Connolly" at Jul 13, 95 12:25:28 pm

> This way, the content models aren't changed: <FIG> is still a
> peer of <P>. But the <spot> element allows the author to suggest
> where the figure should be anchored in the paragraph.
> Do you think that would work?

That looks great to me  I think that the the semantic we want to express is
"associate a figure with a paragraph," not "embed it" there.

 Paul Prescod