Re: <FIG> implies <P>?

Paul Prescod (papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca)
Thu, 13 Jul 1995 14:02:22 -0400 (EDT)


From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Message-Id: <199507131802.OAA03757@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Subject: Re: <FIG> implies <P>?
To: connolly@beach.w3.org (Daniel W. Connolly)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 14:02:22 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: kryee@novice.uwaterloo.ca, mwm@contessa.phone.net, www-html@www10.w3.org
In-Reply-To: <199507131625.MAA07293@beach.w3.org> from "Daniel W. Connolly" at Jul 13, 95 12:25:28 pm

> This way, the content models aren't changed: <FIG> is still a
> peer of <P>. But the <spot> element allows the author to suggest
> where the figure should be anchored in the paragraph.
> 
> Do you think that would work?

That looks great to me  I think that the the semantic we want to express is
"associate a figure with a paragraph," not "embed it" there.

 Paul Prescod