Re: <PAGE> proposal

BearHeart / Bill Weinman (BearHeart@bearnet.com)
Sat, 23 Dec 1995 12:06:16 -0600


Date: Sat, 23 Dec 1995 12:06:16 -0600
Message-Id: <199512231806.MAA12182@primus.paranoia.com>
To: www-html@w3.org
From: BearHeart / Bill Weinman <BearHeart@bearnet.com>
Subject: Re: <PAGE> proposal 


At 11:03 am 12/23/95 -0500, William C. Cheng wrote:
>Eric S. Raymond <esr@locke.ccil.org> wrote:

>| This objection, and all others like it, fails to address one of my central
>| points.  Please try to stop thinking of <PAGE> as document-controlled
>| pagination (though I certainly want to use it that way) and start thinking
>| of it as an attempt to decouple display behavior from underlying file 
>| representation.

>But it seems to me that having separate scrollable sections _couples_
>display behavior with file representation.  <PAGE> doesn't seem to have
>any meaning to anything but displays (or printing, which is another kind
>of display).

   Perhaps in the sense that it adds a functionality that addresses 
an issue for a medium that is otherwise not supported. But in the 
strict sense, it is decoupling the HTML file representation from the 
display behavior of "browser-with-screen", which should not be the 
only medium supported. 

   Someone in here earlier said that they see a "page" as being like 
a "screenful" (not a direct quote)--and that's the mentality that Eric's 
proposal seeks to address. 

   A "page" as a type of object that current HTML ignores. I agree with 
Eric that we need to correct that. 


+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
 * BearHeart / Bill Weinman 
 * BearHeart@bearnet.com *            * http://www.bearnet.com/ *
 * Author of The CGI Book:    * http://www.bearnet.com/cgibook/ *
 * 'Tis an ill cook that cannot lick his own fingers. --Shakespeare