Date: Wed, 19 Apr 95 18:21:13 BST From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Tony Jebson) Message-Id: <9504191721.AA26520@ss38.wg.icl.co.uk> To: email@example.com Subject: Re: Browsers which support HTML 3.0 Tables Further to this, when I've collated all this info, I'll post a summary and a PERL script that tests the HTTP User Agent value! This will probably a subroutine that returns an integer: 0 == plain text only (no in-line GIFs, etc 1 == "standard" HTML (1.0 or 2.0 -- which?). This will be the value returned if the browser type is not recognised. 2 == "standard" HTML + HTML 3.0 tables 3 == full HTML 3.0 I have intentionally omitted "HTML + Netscape specific extensions" as I don't consider this to be a "standard" dialect of HTML! [Comments gratefully received!] --- Tony Jebson --- International Computers Limited (ICL) --- firstname.lastname@example.org --- http://www.to.icl.fi/~aj/ --- All opinions expressed here (however stupid) are my own, --- and nothing stated here is an official statement by ICL.