W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > January to March 2008

OK Re: [curie] [editorial] [process nit] don't say it isn't stable

From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:55:45 -0500
Message-Id: <0BA10BC1-3E00-47E3-BF26-620ECFCF98FF@IEEE.org>
Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>


On 11 Feb 2008, at 2:49 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:

> Al,
>
> Editor's drafts, prior to a publication for last call, in general  
> should ALWAYS say they are not stable. A formal, published working  
> draft will convey the appropriate sense of stability.

Got it.  As I understand your
reply, this is pre-publication language that
will change in the move to in Last Call on TR.

Al

>
> Al Gilman wrote:
>>
>>
>> The language
>> <q cite='http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-curie-20080122/#status'>
>> It is not yet stable,
>> </q>
>> is IMHO inconsistent with the Working Group's decision to go to
>> Last Call.
>>
>> The status paragraph should communicate the WG's consensus
>> that the specification is fit for implementation, and
>> this is a Last Call to test if the wider Web community
>> concurs.
>>
>> Al
>
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
>
>
Received on Monday, 11 February 2008 20:56:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:57 GMT