W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: [curie] [editorial] [process nit] don't say it isn't stable

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:49:52 -0600
Message-ID: <47B0A6E0.2040307@aptest.com>
To: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
CC: www-html-editor@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org

Al,

Editor's drafts, prior to a publication for last call, in general should 
ALWAYS say they are not stable. A formal, published working draft will 
convey the appropriate sense of stability.

Al Gilman wrote:
>
>
> The language
> <q cite='http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-curie-20080122/#status'>
> It is not yet stable,
> </q>
> is IMHO inconsistent with the Working Group's decision to go to
> Last Call.
>
> The status paragraph should communicate the WG's consensus
> that the specification is fit for implementation, and
> this is a Last Call to test if the wider Web community
> concurs.
>
> Al

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 11 February 2008 19:50:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:57 GMT