W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:22:37 +0100
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>, "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
Cc: "public-rdf-in-xhtml task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, www-html-editor@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tnox7zdh64w2qv@id-c0020>

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:57:10 +0100, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
> Which brings up an important topic: validation. It would be good if we
> started a discussion on how it might be possible to extend HTML with
> extra attributes (and possibly elements, although we can start with
> attributes for now). This discussion must involve the validation team,
> since the biggest issue for RDFa is that: it breaks nothing in existing
> browsers, but it breaks the validator. How do we bridge that gap? How do
> we allow for valid HTML extensions without having to push out a new HTML
> recommendation?

The thing is that you also want to add xmlns="" stuff to HTML as I  
understand it. This isn't really feasible imo for the text/html  
serialization. (As it would only have affect to the RDFa stuff and not to  
the rest of the document.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 14:23:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:56 GMT