- From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 21:51:10 +0200
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Hello, This is my first post on this mailing-list. I used to post on www- style but I don't have to read it anymore. So here is my question / request The remaining presentational elements i, b and tt, still allowed in XHTML 1.x (even Strict), will be absent from XHTML 2.0. (<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=XHTML&oldid=62427954#The_XHTML_2.0_draft_specification>) OK for i and b. As for tt, it is perfectly understandable too, but I used to use tt for denoting a semantic thing, namely a sidenote/remark HTML 3.0 used to have such an interesting tag justly called NOTE (see <http://blog.empyree.org/?2284-les-bonnes-idees-de-l-html-30>, in French). I would request W3C to think about this use. Or maybe is there an XHTML 2.0 way to denote this? How? Thank you, -- </david_latapie> http://blog.empyree.org/ U+0F00
Received on Saturday, 8 July 2006 08:53:49 UTC