W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: About TT and XHTML 2.0: requesting a NOTE tag

From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 13:17:06 +0200
Message-ID: <44B0E5B2.6010505@students.cs.uu.nl>
To: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org
David Latapie schreef:
> OK for i and b. As for tt, it is perfectly understandable too, but I 
> used to use tt for denoting a semantic thing, namely a sidenote/remark
>
> HTML 3.0 used to have such an interesting tag justly called NOTE (see 
> <http://blog.empyree.org/?2284-les-bonnes-idees-de-l-html-30>, in 
> French). I would request W3C to think about this use.
>
> Or maybe is there an XHTML 2.0 way to denote this? How?

Yes, it already exists:

<section role="note">

(or any other element with that role attribute)


~Grauw

-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.



Received on Sunday, 9 July 2006 11:17:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:55 GMT