W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: The xhtml:onkeypress architecture

From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:25:43 +0000
To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org
Message-id: <A29ADE959C70A1449470AA9A212F5D800125141F@LONSMSXM06.emea.ime.reuters.com>

Hi Steven,

I can't view this spec using IE 6 !


-----Original Message-----
From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Steven Pemberton
Sent: 14 February 2006 14:19
To: Anne van Kesteren
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann; www-tag@w3.org; HTML WG
Subject: The xhtml:onkeypress architecture

Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> Except that it is not. It adds quite an amount of attributes in the 
> XHTML namespace. Besides using xml:id I could now use xhtml:id on any 
> number of elements as well as xhtml:onkeypress as the subject of this 
> thread suggests. These are quite substantial changes from previous 
> versions of XHTML I'm sure not many implementors would've agreed to.

These changes do *not* affect XHTML, and the text points that out quite 
clearly, in bold type no less.

"Each of the attributes defined in an XHTML attribute collection is 
available for use when their corresponding module is included in an 
XHTML Host Language or an XHTML Integration Set. In such a situation, 
the attributes are available for use in the definition of elements that 
are NOT in the XHTML namespace when they are referenced using their 
namespace-qualified identifier (e.g., xhtml:id). The semantics of the 
attributes remain the same regardless of whether they are referenced 
using their qualified identifier or not. On elements in the XHTML 
namespace, it is an error to use a namespace-qualified attribute."

This section *only* makes the attributes available to other markup 
languages *if they should wish to use them* in that markup language 

Steven Pemberton

To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 14:25:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:08:54 UTC