Shane McCarron wrote: >> As I have explained, there is no mechanism for the author to >> control the rendering in CSS environments, that is compatible with >> the two views. I reject the issue as there is no technical way an >> author can achieve the required sizing if they do have different >> sizes. > > I understand that you disagree with this decision, and have noted it > in the database. I agree with the disagreement and object to the decision of the HTML WG. There has been some activity on www-style to found a solution for this problem as it clearly doesn't solely apply to XHTML 2.0 — think of xhtml1:img, xhtml1:object — and I believe the outcome of that was that it doesn't fit in the CSS model. I hope the HTML WG can discuss this with the CSS WG to find a feasible solution before XHTML 2.0 enters last call or propose another mechanism for embedding. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>Received on Saturday, 28 May 2005 12:00:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:10 GMT