W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: XFrames WD 11 March 2003 - Suggestions

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:48:36 +0200
Message-ID: <011901c33039$4dc06770$df13fea9@srx41p>
To: "Claus Wahlers" <claus@mozquito.com>, <www-html-editor@w3.org>

I agree. Thanks for the input.

Steven Pemberton

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Claus Wahlers" <claus@mozquito.com>
To: <www-html-editor@w3.org>
Cc: "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:07 PM
Subject: XFrames WD 11 March 2003 - Suggestions


> "Issue: use the CSS table layout algorithm instead?"
> I think this would not be a good idea, as i really love the simplicity of
> things, a table layout algorithm may be too complex for the things that
need
> to be solved and moves too far away from HTML Frames that everyone is
using
> today.
>
> ---
>
> I would suggest allowing the "compose" attribute on the frames element.
This
> way we could allow any combination of frame and group children in frames
(as
> opposed to the current working draft where only frame elements or one
group
> element are allowed). I already implemented this in my XFrames renderer.
> There seem to be no sideeffects.
> http://claus.packts.net/deng/examples/xframes/links/index.xfm
> http://claus.packts.net/deng/examples/xframes/links/
> (Macromedia Flash Player 6 required)
>
> ---
>
> For links/targets in combination with XFrames you should sync with Tantek
> who already proposed a possible solution W3C-internally (using CSS).
>
> cheers,
> claus.
> http://mozquito.com
> http://w3blog.com/news
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:48:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:45 GMT