W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > October to December 2000

Experience Report [5]: Modularization of XHTML

From: Sean Palmer <wapdesign@wapdesign.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:04:06 +0100
Message-ID: <01b401c04005$a09976c0$8bdd93c3@z5n9x1>
To: <www-html-editor@w3.org>
Cc: <mimasa@w3.org>, "Tapio Markula" <tapio1@gamma.nic.fi>
Dear Editor (et al.),
This is an implementation experience report in reply to the Modularization
of XHTML [http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization] specification going to
Candidate Recommendation:
"[5] A Re-Structuring of the Text and XHTML DTD Support Modules - Issues
that could be addressed before PR".

1) Current system:-
Text Module [
Inline Phrasal; Inline Structural
Block Phrasal; Block Structural ]

2) Could be re-layered as:-

Text Module [
Structural Text; Phrasal Text ]

Structural Text [
Inline Structural; Block Structural ]
Phrasal Text [
Inline Phrasal; Block Phrasal ]

To allow us to use either Phrasal or Structural text when defining
*derivaive* Modularization markup languages, as per: (F.4)
> "The modules in this section are elements of the
> XHTML DTD implementation that, while hidden
> from casual users, are important to understand
> when creating derivative markup languages using
> the Modularization architecture."

Just an idea to make the system a little clearer!

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
WAP Tech Info - http://www.waptechinfo.com/
Received on Friday, 27 October 2000 07:05:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:08:24 UTC