W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: Liaison statement on fragment identifiers from Linking WG

From: Lauren Wood <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 14:06:12 -0700
Message-Id: <199905172112.OAA29759@sqwest.bc.ca>
To: Bill Smith <bill.smith@sun.com>, shane@themacs.com
CC: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>, w3c-xml-cg@w3.org, w3c-html-wg@w3.org, www-html-editor@w3.org, w3c-xml-linking-wg@w3.org

Can someone please help me clear my confusion? I've read this 
thread to mean that XHTML is keeping the A NAME attribute as 
being of type CDATA, but the actual DTD at 
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml1-19990505/DTD/transitional.dtd
says it is of type ID, and the ID attribute is of type NMTOKEN.


Lauren

Received on Monday, 17 May 1999 17:13:19 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Shane P. McCarron: "Re: Liaison statement on fragment identifiers from Linking WG"
Previous message: Ann Navarro: "Re: Liaison statement on fragment identifiers from Linking WG"
In reply to: Shane P. McCarron: "Re: Liaison statement on fragment identifiers from Linking WG"
Next in thread: Shane P. McCarron: "Re: Liaison statement on fragment identifiers from Linking WG"
Reply: Shane P. McCarron: "Re: Liaison statement on fragment identifiers from Linking WG"
Reply: Steven Pemberton: "Re: Liaison statement on fragment identifiers from Linking WG"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:27:26 GMT