Re: Developing errata for 4.0

 > I guess the first issue here for me is: Does the new HTML WG
 > wish to assume the persistent activities of the former WG, including
 > errata management and translation requests/offers? If so,

I have always taken the position that we would do that, since HTML 4
is our starting point, and everything that changes in 4 has an effect
on 5; therefore it seems better that we be involved in the process,
and therefore that we do it.

On the other hand I didn't realise you rereleased 4.0. I thought that
the 4.0 report was cast in stone, and that errata and interpretations
were released as separate documents (that's what we're doing for CSS
isn't it?).

Steven