oops... got the address wrong the first time. -- Dan http://www.w3.org/Team/connolly phone://1/512/310-2971
attached mail follows:
I just noticed: ========== http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-html40/struct/links.html#h-7.6.2.3 The A element may define an anchor, a link, or both. ========== The A element *always* defines an anchor. A link consists of two anchors: the source and destination (a whole document is also an anchor). ======== The id and name attributes share the same name space (see [ISO10646]). ======== What has ISO10646 got to do with the ID/NAME namespace? The spec currently makes it sound like ID/NAME share a namespace for some reason defined by ISO10646 or the SGML spec. That's not the reason. This notion is novel to the HTML spec. The whole link section in the 8 July draft is goofy. -- Dan http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Thursday, 21 August 1997 12:18:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:42 GMT