W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > December 2008

RE: XForms 1.1 implementation

From: <VanRotterdam_Jeroen@emc.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:06:22 -0500
Message-ID: <46B462F40D43BC48932F6D24F430E356044A117C@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>
To: <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-forms@w3.org>
Hi John,

 

I will ask the team to post the test report. Obviously we are testing
against the test suite.

 

Best regards,

 

Jeroen

 

From: John Boyer [mailto:boyerj@ca.ibm.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 7:49 PM
To: VanRotterdam, Jeroen
Cc: www-forms@w3.org
Subject: Re: XForms 1.1 implementation

 


Hi Jeroen, 

This is very exciting news. Congratulations on your release. 
Your conformance level to the specification is very good, and on behalf
of the W3C Forms working group, I would like to ask if you could provide
an implementation report of your XForms 1.1 engine. 
Having the documented knowledge of which tests you pass will greatly
help the working group to advance XForms 1.1 to full recommendation. 

An example of the report is here:
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2008/XForms11ImplReports/FFplugins/Result
sTable.html
<http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2008/XForms11ImplReports/FFplugins/Resul
tsTable.html>  
The test suite is here:
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Test/XForms1.1/Edition1/driverPages/html/
<http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Test/XForms1.1/Edition1/driverPages/html
/>  

Please let us know if this will be possible.  It would be a great
service to the W3C if it were possible as we would use your
implementation report as part of the requirements to advance XForms 1.1
to proposed recommendation, which is the version that the fulll W3C then
decides upon for full recommendation.  Participating in this way has
obvious implications for raising awareness of the availability of your
processor. 

Thank you, 
John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications
Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Victoria Software Lab
E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com  

Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
<http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer> 
Blog RSS feed:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
<http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw> 





From: 

VanRotterdam_Jeroen@emc.com 

To: 

<www-forms@w3.org> 

Date: 

12/17/2008 12:26 AM 

Subject: 

XForms 1.1 implementation

 

________________________________




EMC recently implemented an XForms 1.1 engine. 
  
Highlights: 
  
-          GWT implementation deployable as a pure javascript engine
without any server requirements 
-          Over 90% compliant to the XForms 1.1 spec. limitations: 
o   No XML Schema types support 
o   Only basic serialization as application/xml is currently supported 
-          Several enhancements beyond XForms 1.1, especially support
for layout documents 
  
Enhancements are implemented as pure enhancements on top of the core
XForms 1.1 implementation 
  
Best regards, 
  
Jeroen 
  
  
Jeroen van Rotterdam 
General Manager XML Solutions 
EMC Corporation 
mail: VanRotterdam_Jeroen@emc.com 
voice: +31 10 2818080 
  
  
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2008 20:17:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:15 GMT