W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > January 2007

Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny and WF2

From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:59:40 -0500
Message-ID: <45B9608C.3000201@earthlink.net>
To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
CC: WHAT WG List <whatwg@whatwg.org>, www-forms@w3.org, public-appformats@w3.org

Klotz, Leigh wrote:
>>   Explain to me why Web Forms 2.0 shouldn't be "incorporating more of
>> the great ideas" in XForms-Tiny rather than the other way around. Why is
>> your approach to cannibalize an existing W3C working draft to enrich a
>> draft you haven't even finished yet? What, in your opinion, makes WF2
>> unsalvageable?
> Or what makes you want to cannibalize an existing W3C Recommendation
> which predates the formation of WHAT-WG?

   Are you trying to justify hypercannibalization?!? Or are you just
trying to cover up the fact that XForms and WF2 don't occupy the same
niche, but XForms-Tiny and WF2 do?
Received on Friday, 26 January 2007 02:00:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:36:19 UTC