W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > January 2007

RE: [whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny and WF2

From: Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:51:55 -0800
Message-ID: <E254B0A7E0268949ABFE5EA97B7D0CF402B2DE04@usa7061ms01.na.xerox.net>
To: "Matthew Raymond" <mattraymond@earthlink.net>, "Dave Raggett" <dsr@w3.org>
Cc: "WHAT WG List" <whatwg@whatwg.org>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <public-appformats@w3.org>

Or what makes you want to cannibalize an existing W3C Recommendation
which predates the formation of WHAT-WG?
>   Explain to me why Web Forms 2.0 shouldn't be "incorporating more of
the great ideas" in XForms-Tiny rather than the other way around. Why is
your approach to cannibalize an existing W3C working draft to enrich a
draft you haven't even finished yet? What, in your opinion, makes WF2
unsalvageable?
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:52:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:08 GMT