W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > May 2006

Re: Deploying (accessible) XForms today?

From: Stefano Debenedetti <ste@demaledetti.net>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 21:42:47 +0200
Message-ID: <445BAAB7.2010209@demaledetti.net>
To: Charles F Wiecha <wiecha@us.ibm.com>
CC: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>, www-forms@w3.org, www-forms-request@w3.org

Charles F Wiecha ha scritto:
> 
> Erik writes...
> 
>>>and Ajax is here to stay, which makes this is a very important topic.
> 
> Perhaps one angle to explore here is to work toward AJAX toolkits having
> more direct support for XForms.  Many of them are now introducing data
> models, model-view binding notations, and event systems.  If these were
> aligned more closely with XForms we'd have a much better story not only
> for accessibiliy but in general...
> 
> Charlie Wiecha

Excellent point, btw it would be a great start if AJAX-based XForms implementations offered interfaces and APIs that are sexier to the more general AJAX crowd and/or that make it easy to integrate with frenzier libraries... 

ciao
ste
 
> 
> 
> *Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>*
> Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org
> 
> 05/05/2006 02:21 PM
> 
> 	
> To
> 	www-forms@w3.org
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	Re: Deploying (accessible) XForms today?
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Raman,
> 
> I don't think that the fact that today's implementations do not meet
> accessibility requirements necessarily means they cannot. At least, I
> would like to see compelling arguments in that direction, and clearer
> technical details about exactly what is lost (and shouldn't be lost) by
> going from XForms to XHTML.
> 
> IE is not supporting XForms anytime soon, and Ajax is here to stay,
> which makes this is a very important topic.
> 
> I think ignorance of the requirements for accessibility is a more
> important reason why most Ajax-based web applications maybe lack in
> accessibility. We are unfortunately as guilty as anyone here.
> 
> -Erik
> 
> T.V Raman wrote:
>>
>>>From what I've seen coming out of some of the server side
>> processors, I'm afraid your're correct
>>
>> Allan Beaufour writes:
>>  >
>>  > Since not everybody is using a browser with XForms capabilities, if
>>  > you want to deploy XForms today, server-side transformations might be
>>  > needed. But how about accessibility? I fear that you loose that then?
>>  >
>>  > /me steps aside and hopes for some good answers from the
> server-side crowd :)
>>  >
>>  > --
>>  > ... Allan
> 
> -- 
> Orbeon - XForms Everywhere:
> http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 5 May 2006 19:42:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:04 GMT