W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > May 2006

Re: XForms Basic and Schema Validation

From: Allan Beaufour <beaufour@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:27:46 +0200
Message-ID: <90d6cb0e0605040227r7c8dece4r5d1ea0c9b23399ad@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Cc: www-forms@w3.org

On 5/4/06, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net> wrote:
> However, one thing is certain--the error (using an undefined type) cannot be
> ignored. On the telecon earlier today, people kept saying that if a
> non-existent type was referenced then the processor should interpret the
> node as being of type xsd:string; I don't see how this interpretation was
> arrived at, and it's certainly not in the specification.

It is in Basic is it not:
"XForms Basic Profile processors may treat XML Schema datatypes other
than the following as xsd:string: [... list of types]"
[http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms-basic/#id2606183]

--
... Allan
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 09:27:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:04 GMT