W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > June 2005

RE: XForms on Mobile Devices

From: Jason Eacott <jeacott@hardlight.com.au>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:13:44 +0930
To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
Cc: www-forms@w3.org
Message-ID: <42AE9FC8.19031.19975676@localhost>

nice!

Date sent:      	Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:41:38 -0700
From:           	"Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
To:             	<avernet@orbeon.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>
Subject:        	RE: XForms on Mobile Devices
Forwarded by:   	www-forms@w3.org
Date forwarded: 	Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:42:14 +0000

> 
> Alex,
> Check this out: 
>   http://www.beaufour.dk/blog-archives/2005/05/xforms_status_u_11.html
>   http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=xforms+minimo
> Leigh.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Alessandro Vernet
> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 9:56 PM
> To: www-forms@w3.org
> Subject: XForms on Mobile Devices
> 
> 
> XForms already provides a number of benefits compared to HTML 4 forms on
> browsers, but would be even more valuable on mobile devices (for
> instance:
> less round-trips with the server, lesser need for JavaScript, device
> independence). Despite the benefits, XForms on mobile devices seems to
> be an emerging technology at best, with so far only two major
> initiatives I am aware of, from IBM and Oracle (see below).
> 
> Are there other initiatives I am not aware of? More generally, what is
> the state of XForms on mobile devices?
> 
> Alex
> 
> 

-- 
Jason Eacott
Hardlight Interactive
http://www.hardlight.com.au

Support bacteria - they're the only culture some people have.
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 00:00:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:01 GMT