W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > June 2003

Re: W3C XForms: Rest In Peace

From: George Cao <george_cao@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 09:32:29 -0700
To: <www-forms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Law8-OE41nOrvi4a1yr0000c825@hotmail.com>

XUL is a natural choice for implementing xforms, especially in combination
with XBL.  And Brendan Eich is absolutely correct, with xforms support, XUL
should become even more useful in building web applications.  And of course
Brendan was referring to XUL as the mozilla technology :)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerald Bauer" <luxorxul@yahoo.ca>
To: <www-forms@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 9:10 AM
Subject: W3C XForms: Rest In Peace


>
> Hi,
>
>   I guess the silence following my last mail titled
> "XUL Alliance Site Goes Live - New XML UI Standards
> Body Emerging?" speaks for itself.
>
>   That I'm not alone, may I quote Brendan Eich
> (Mozilla Roadmap Author) from his slashdot post:
>
> <quote>
> XUL with some form-submission smarts, but using
> XML-RPC, SOAP, WSDL, or whatever's appropriate, should
> become the basis for web applications. XUL widgets
> should form the kernel of a pragmatic XForms
> implementation.
> </quote>
>
>   Any thoughts?
>
>   - Gerald
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
>
>
Received on Saturday, 7 June 2003 12:34:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:55 GMT