W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > July 2002

Re: XForms Schema Attached

From: Jérôme Nègre <jerome.negre@e-xmlmedia.fr>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 14:29:02 +0200
Message-ID: <066e01c2330d$b1f8a8d0$630aa8c0@fischer>
To: "Micah Dubinko" <MDubinko@cardiff.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>


Glad to have some news from the Working Group!

This schema resolves several issues, but the following points are unclear to

1) In <model>, shouldn't it be <xsd:group ref="xforms:actionGroup"/> instead
of <xsd:element ref="xforms:action"/>?

2) In <submission>, may-be that providing a default value for @method would
be useful.

3) Why use @ref in <bind> instead of @nodeset? It would be much more
consistent IMHO.

4) Everything is now in lowercase, except @minOccurs and @maxOccurs of
<bind>, is it on purpose?

5) I think there's a missing minOccurs="0" in the xsd:sequence of <label>,
<hint>, <help> and <alert>.

6) @id of <choices> and <item> should have an explicit use="optional" to be
more consistent.

7) Does incremental="true" means the use of a spinner or equivalent? If the
answer is yes, I'm not sure it's very relevant on <secret>.

8) I'm not sure that the new name <select1> is better than the old
<selectOne>. Same issue with <select> and <selectMany>.

9) <selectMany>, er no, <select> has now @selection, I hope a suggestion of
rendering for a graphical browser will be available.

10) what's the use of bindFirstAttributes on <trigger>?

11) where is <repeat> gone, and what's the use of all those @repeat-*?

12) In <switch>, @id could be optional.

13) In <switch>, what's the use of @default? Shouldn't @selected in <case>
be used instead?

Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 08:30:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:36:06 UTC