> 0) The long term goal is for XForms to replace HTML forms. Then you need to fully support GET going forward. > 1) HTTP GET > for submitting large amounts of data is depricated because of its > well-known problems in that area. Of course. But HTML GET forms are not used for submitting large amounts of data. They are used to construct a new URI. > 2) If you read the XForms spec, you'll see that it takes care of > legacy issues and backward compatibility, > as well as transitioning things to the new world. I can't find any discussion of these issues in the latest WD. There's a mention of transitioning from HTML to XForms in section 2, but it doesn't mention GET. Do you have an URL for the section you're referring to? MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.comReceived on Thursday, 17 January 2002 20:38:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 October 2007 16:01:48 GMT