W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms-editor@w3.org > September 2002

Re: [Moderator Action] RE: XForms WD 20020821 - 2.1 Code Error?

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:21:46 +0200
Message-ID: <165d01c25366$00d9d280$228a608a@inria.fr>
To: "Tomayko, Ryan" <Ryan_Tomayko@stercomm.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>

Moderator: Sent to www-forms-editor@w3.org  and www-forms@w3.org

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomayko, Ryan" <Ryan_Tomayko@stercomm.com>
To: <www-forms@w3.org>; <xforms@yahoogroups.com>; <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:32 PM
Subject: [Moderator Action] RE: XForms WD 20020821 - 2.1 Code Error?


>
>
>
> I think the example is correct. With the latest draft, the context node
for
> binding elements is the document root element.
>
> >From Section 7.3 Evaluation Context:
>
> <<
> 1. The context node for outermost binding elements is the top level
element
> node, or the single node returned by /*.
> >>
>
> This is a change from the last working draft where the context node for
> outermost binding elements was "/", not "/*".
>
> Note that many of the examples have been using absolute XPath expressions
> which makes the new evaluation context rule less obvious. That example is
> actually the first place I've seen relatives used in an outermost binding
> element.
>
> - Ryan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Dennedy [mailto:DDennedy@digitalbang.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 8:54 AM
> To: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com; www-forms@w3.org; www-forms-editor@w3.org;
> xforms@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: XForms WD 20020821 - 2.1 Code Error?
>
>
>
> > From: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com
> >
> > The two parts of the example code do not seem, to me at
> > least, to correspond.
> >
> > For example, the ref attribute of the abominable <select1>
> > element contains the value of "method".
> >
> > If I was coding this I would give it the value of
> > "root/method". This works in X-Smiles.
>
> Good point, as this would be broken on my processor too, which requires
> "root/method" as well.
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:21:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 June 2009 18:12:12 GMT