W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms-editor@w3.org > September 2002

Re: [Moderator Action] RE: XForms WD 20020821 - 2.1 Code Error?

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:21:16 +0200
Message-ID: <164d01c25365$edd55a60$228a608a@inria.fr>
To: Plech¹míd Martin <Martin.Plechsmid@merlin.cz>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>

Moderator: Sent to www-forms-editor@w3.org  and www-forms@w3.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Plech¹míd Martin" <Martin.Plechsmid@merlin.cz>
To: <www-forms@w3.org>; <xforms@yahoogroups.com>; <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 5:00 PM
Subject: [Moderator Action] RE: XForms WD 20020821 - 2.1 Code Error?


>
>
>
> Is there a reason for this change? I'd prefer the original version with
"/"
> instead of "/*". "/" is what I'd expect without reading the specs.
>
> Martin.
>
>
> > From Section 7.3 Evaluation Context:
> >
> > <<
> > 1. The context node for outermost binding elements is the top
> > level element
> > node, or the single node returned by /*.
> > >>
> >
> > This is a change from the last working draft where the
> > context node for
> > outermost binding elements was "/", not "/*".
> >
> > Note that many of the examples have been using absolute XPath
> > expressions
> > which makes the new evaluation context rule less obvious.
> > That example is
> > actually the first place I've seen relatives used in an
> > outermost binding
> > element.
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:21:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 June 2009 18:12:12 GMT