W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms-editor@w3.org > September 2002

Re: [Moderator Action] 7.8.1 - property() function - version property

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:04:32 +0200
Message-ID: <140a01c25363$973d4d40$228a608a@inria.fr>
To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>

Moderator: sent to www-forms@w3.org and www-forms-editor@w3.org
----- Original Message -----
From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
To: <xforms@yahoogroups.com>; <www-forms@w3.org>; <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:36 AM
Subject: [Moderator Action] 7.8.1 - property() function - version property


>
>
>
> In 7.8.1 reference is made to the version property. The example code seems
to
> illustrate a situation where the value of the version property is
contained
> in the instance data.
>
> This seems to me to be a very odd design. Why, for example, is there not a
> version attribute on the xforms:model element with, for version 1.0, the
only
> legal value specified as "1.0"? Then an XForms processor knows what it is
> dealing with - at least as far as the XForms model goes.
>
> I appreciate that a missing version attribute might by default be
interpreted
> as "1.0" but why not put a version attribute on xforms:model and give it a
> value?
>
> Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:05:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 June 2009 18:12:12 GMT