Re: Comments on pre-CR draft

Klotz, Leigh wrote:

> Thank you.  Please pardon my French.


No apology needed.  It was good enough to be understandable and 
therefore correctable.

> The example itelf may change somewhat by the next draft, so I cannot
> guarantee that this exact example (and hence your corrections) will be used,
> but we will produce correct examples for the CR draft. 
> 
> Is that OK?


Sure.

Regards,

-- 
François