W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms-editor@w3.org > August 2002

Re: 84- Response to your issue sent to the XForms WG about the XForm s Last Call WD

From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 16:53:21 -0700
Message-ID: <3D4B1B71.D3AAA4E2@prescod.net>
To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com>
CC: "'www-forms-editor@w3.org'" <www-forms-editor@w3.org>

Yes, thank you (collectively) very much for your attention to these
issues!

 Paul Prescod

"Klotz, Leigh" wrote:
> 
> Dear Paul Prescod:
> 
> Your comments [1] on the www-forms@w3.org mailing list about the
> XForms Last Call Working draft [2] were forwarded to the
> XForms Last Call mailing list [3] have been captured as
> Last Call Issue 84.
> 
> Please respond to state whether you agree with resolution below.
> 
> Thank you,
> Leigh L. Klotz, Jr.
> --------------------------------
> XForms WG Resolution:
> 
> Please refer to the XForms Schema recently published [4] for
> the following discussion.
> 
> I. GET is no longer deprecated in our next upcoming public draft.
> We will include references to [5] and [6].
> 
> II. The default for XForms for multiple fields with HTTP GET is to separate
> with semicolon.
> The <submission separator=...> attribute allows the use of either ampersand
> or semicolon.
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2002Jan/0155.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xforms-20020118/
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2002Feb/0106.html
> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2002Jul/0045.html
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7
> [6] RFC 2616 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt)

-- 
XML, Web Services Architecture, REST Architectural Style
Consulting, training, programming: http://www.constantrevolution.com
Come discuss XML and REST web services at the Extreme Markup Conference
Received on Friday, 2 August 2002 19:54:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 June 2009 18:12:11 GMT