Re: Agenda, action items and suggested WOFF changes from Dave Crossland on 2010-05-11 (www-font@w3.org from April to June 2010)

From: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 20:36:21 +0200
To: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin6IKdl_tehOKbhskp4w3WlRIl4wJD-bWNmND5d@mail.gmail.com>

On 11 May 2010 20:17, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com> wrote:
> Thomas Phinney wrote:
>
>> I would expect the browser
>> folks to object strenuously to this if that was the expectation.
>
> There is no expectation at all on UA agents. The proposed text re. embedding
> bits is that UA's will ignore them completely. The question regards tools
> for creating WOFF files.

Why will WOFF tool folks not object strenuously to this?

Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 18:37:14 UTC