RE: Next step?

Thursday, October 22, 2009 Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>:

See Daggett's posting from Tuesday July 28th, 2009 to this list which has a
"description" of the EOT-Lite font wrapper.
Also see the EOT submission to the W3C.
EOT Lite was implemented in a special edition of FF's nightly "Minefield"
builds. The info to do that came from somewhere, presumably.

Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: www-font-request@w3.org [mailto:www-font-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
Tal Leming
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:59 PM
To: Tab Atkins Jr.
Cc: Erik van Blokland; www-font
Subject: Re: Next step?


On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

>>> WOFF and CWT still need full specs,
>>
>> I think you'll find WOFF has a spec, but CWT hasn't?
>
> CWT has at least as full of a spec as WOFF does, I believe - it was
> defined in its current form by Daggett.

Really? I remember a loose spec being posted to the list and then  
heavily debated. I don't seem to recall seeing anything official or  
definitive. On the other hand, WOFF has this:

	http://people.mozilla.org/~jkew/woff/woff-spec-latest.html

Tal