- From: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:59:26 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Erik van Blokland <erik@letterror.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> WOFF and CWT still need full specs, >> >> I think you'll find WOFF has a spec, but CWT hasn't? > > CWT has at least as full of a spec as WOFF does, I believe - it was > defined in its current form by Daggett. Really? I remember a loose spec being posted to the list and then heavily debated. I don't seem to recall seeing anything official or definitive. On the other hand, WOFF has this: http://people.mozilla.org/~jkew/woff/woff-spec-latest.html Tal
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:00:01 UTC