Re: Format name proposals

John Hudson wrote:
> François REMY wrote:
>> *Compatible* Web Font (CWF) sounds great for me. BTW, the name doesn't
>> matter. Only the implementation does.
> 
> I would prefer font to type, also, but unfortunately, the file extension
> .cwf is already in use.

Where does the 3 letter file extension requirement come from? I
understand that MS-DOS couldn't handle longer extensions but there
should not be such limitation in the Internet.

How about
	Legacy Compatible Web Font
with file extension .lcwf?

-- 
Mikko