> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-font/2009JulSep/1320.html >... (with the .CWT file extension). Sounds good. I can't have any better idea. If the format will be really open, it's reasonable to avoid proprietary trademarks. I didn't get the meaning of WOFF (maybe is better stop think about what the middle F could mean). Independent of the name, I strongly support this more refined proposal too. I hope that you members of W3C involved with type technology can work toghether and make some decisions about it. -- Ricardo Esteves http://www.outrasfontes.comReceived on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 00:28:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 26 August 2009 00:29:08 GMT