W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: EOT & DMCA concerns

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:02:35 +1200
Message-ID: <11e306600908041502g168be11dy8e089bfc7d82019d@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: HÃ¥kon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>, Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, www-font@w3.org
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> Since Daggett is behind the current EOTL1.1 proposal, hopefully that
> says that Moz is cool with the format.

That's jumping to conclusions. We're trying to figure out what the best
version of EOTL would be and what its pros and cons would be. Only then can
we evaluate the format.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 22:03:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:41 UTC