W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: EOT-Lite File Format

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:17:53 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E02133030@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

>From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]


>Excuse me for being dense, but does that mean that IE<=8 will
>effectively treat it as a version number of 0x00020000, but IE9 can
>reliably distinguish it from 0x2000000?

It'd read the header up to the latest version it understands (0x00020002) then
skip whatever is leftover (in this case 0 bytes) and that's it.

Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 00:18:36 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: EOT-Lite File Format"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: EOT-Lite File Format"
In reply to: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: EOT-Lite File Format"
Next in thread: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: EOT-Lite File Format"
Reply: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: EOT-Lite File Format"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT