W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: EOT-Lite File Format

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:19:45 -0500
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0907301719i2d145d04qe34c44411df6677c@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Cc: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Sylvain Galineau<sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
>>Excuse me for being dense, but does that mean that IE<=8 will
>>effectively treat it as a version number of 0x00020000, but IE9 can
>>reliably distinguish it from 0x2000000?
> It'd read the header up to the latest version it understands (0x00020002) then
> skip whatever is leftover (in this case 0 bytes) and that's it.

So legacy IEs will or won't render a font with a version of 0x00020003?

Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 00:20:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:40 UTC