W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite

From: Christopher Slye <cslye@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:26:08 -0700
CC: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <63EE5EAB-AFD2-441D-B8D8-D1E980BDEB26@adobe.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
This has a nice ring to it. :)

-Christopher


On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:39 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote:

> I agree with you. Our @font-face implementation must be fixed and  
> Windows
> must do a better job support CFF fonts. No argument.

[ ... ]

> Allow me to be my slow self and replay this: you'd be much more  
> comfortable
> supporting EOTL if we publicly committed to addressing both issues,  
> and to do
> so by the time IE9 ships at the latest, with, I think an emphasis on  
> addressing
> CFF issues earlier.
>
> Am I getting this right ?
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 00:27:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT