W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: A way forward

From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:51:12 -0700
To: karsten luecke <list@kltf.de>
Cc: www-font@w3.org
Message-Id: <1248475872.7681.49.camel@dell-desktop.example.com>
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 00:30 +0200, karsten luecke wrote:
> Thomas Lord wrote:
> > (b) Will restricted license type vendors agree to
> > license in that variant?
> 
> Please don't construct issues where there are none.
> ..webfont is being expected by quite a number of foundries:
> http://typegirl.tumblr.com/post/142912558/most-of-the-important-foundries-are-supporting-webfont
> Ascender who favor EOT Lite and today released tools for it are on this list. Monotype who has declared to license EOT fonts for web use is also on this list. I am convinced that if any of them will see things going into the wrong direction will cry out loud.  :D
> 
> Best wishes, Karsten


I did not mean to imply it unlikely that
the type vendors would agree.  I would 
find it likely for the reasons you mention
and others.   I only meant that we ought
to double check and formalize that understanding
among us all.

-t
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 22:51:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT