Re: A way forward

Thomas Lord wrote:
> (b) Will restricted license type vendors agree to
> license in that variant?

Please don't construct issues where there are none.
..webfont is being expected by quite a number of foundries:
http://typegirl.tumblr.com/post/142912558/most-of-the-important-foundries-are-supporting-webfont
Ascender who favor EOT Lite and today released tools for it are on this list. Monotype who has declared to license EOT fonts for web use is also on this list. I am convinced that if any of them will see things going into the wrong direction will cry out loud.  :D

Best wishes, Karsten

Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 22:36:01 UTC