W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: .webfont Proposal 2

From: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:54:43 -0400
Message-ID: <f49ae6ac0907171154l734f26b1kba5fb4b4a8ec99eb@mail.gmail.com>
To: karsten luecke <list@kltf.de>
Cc: www-font@w3.org
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:42 AM, karsten luecke<list@kltf.de> wrote:
> Sylvain Galineau wrote:
>> Correction: Many discussions have established that we will *not* achieve
>> interop if Rootstrings are required to be enforced by the user agent.
>
> Ok.
> It seems that I read something into .webfont's "allow" that is not there.

Maybe I have, too. What is the intention of the
URL-where-the-font-is-allowed-to-be-used in the .webfont format?

Tal, Erik, would it be a requirement of .webfont format that if such a
URL is present, browsers enforce it?

T
Received on Friday, 17 July 2009 18:55:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:02 GMT