Re: .webfont Proposal 2

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:42 AM, karsten luecke<list@kltf.de> wrote:
> Sylvain Galineau wrote:
>> Correction: Many discussions have established that we will *not* achieve
>> interop if Rootstrings are required to be enforced by the user agent.
>
> Ok.
> It seems that I read something into .webfont's "allow" that is not there.

Maybe I have, too. What is the intention of the
URL-where-the-font-is-allowed-to-be-used in the .webfont format?

Tal, Erik, would it be a requirement of .webfont format that if such a
URL is present, browsers enforce it?

T