On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Thomas Lord<lord@emf.net> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 01:09 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: >> Your solution requires changes to the exact same software but that's good because you state that is so. > > You are frothing at the mouth. And abusing the phrase > "exact same" quite a bit. > > Would you like to discuss in more detail how my > proposal significantly differs? Or, are > we just muddying the waters here? In this respect your proposal does *not* significantly differ. A wrapper format for fonts requires the same kind of changes to browsers (we can debate the exact magnitude, but all of the current proposals are relatively small) that any obfuscation-based or compression-based proposal requires. Just accepting EOT or TTF/OTF would mean that at least *some* browsers don't have to put forth any new effort. Anything else (including your proposal) means changes in all of them. ~TJReceived on Friday, 3 July 2009 02:50:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:02 GMT