W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback

From: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:21:45 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <61027177C88032458A7862054B3C6258059922@TK5EX14MBXW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> 
Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] wrote:
>Certainly.  That's still completely orthogonal to the webfont format,
>though.  No format that has been proposed has ever used (presumably
>machine-readable) license terms to control how the *author* can use
>fonts.

Is this what EOT and the embedding bit in TTF does?
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 21:22:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 25 July 2009 00:12:02 GMT