W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:08:23 -0500
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0907021408yf1b392v2de8d019ab319601@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
Cc: HÃ¥kon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Chris Wilson<Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>In all the discussion, I can't recall this specific question being
>>asked, so I'll ask it: What exactly is the problem with supporting
>>TTF/OTF *and* another format?
>
> My problem is with supporting TTF/OTF period; of course, I don't demand that some other system remove their support, but I find it inherently limited and would prefer to have one format that makes it easy for all fonts.

I'm sorry, but that doesn't quite answer my question.  What is *wrong*
with supporting both TTF/OTF and another format?

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 21:09:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:02 GMT