W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > January to March 2000

RE: What's an em

From: Karlsson Kent - keka <keka@im.se>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 19:25:39 +0100
Message-ID: <C110A2268F8DD111AA1A00805F85E58DA68597@ntgbg1>
To: www-font@w3.org


> -----Original Message-----
> From: erik@netscape.com [mailto:erik@netscape.com]
...
> Karlsson Kent - keka wrote:
> > 
> > I don't think 'font-size-adjust' is a good way of doing this,
> > though, since that relies on the author to give an aspect value,
> 
> I already made a suggestion to rectify that:
> 
>   BODY { font-family: Verdana; font-size-adjust: first-avail; }

I'm not sure of the implications of that.  And, most importantly,
I want something that is EASY to understand for everyone, so that
web page authors use it.  If it's too tricky or errorprone, then
it will not be used.  I find font-size-adjust to be both too hard
to understand (ratio, what ratio?), and the above makes it more
tricky still.  'font-size ex-height <the size asked for>' is
straight-forward and easy to teach and understand. (I know
it's not nirvana, never will be, never claimed it would be.)

		Kind regards
		/kent k
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2000 13:26:17 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 13:06:24 EDT