- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 20:00:35 +0200
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org
* Boris Zbarsky wrote: >On 6/4/13 11:19 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: >> Really? To JavaScript programmers, it's the only thing that makes sense. >> There is no way in native JavaScript semantics to do the magic thing the >> web platform currently does, wherein (a) code is executed synchronously, >> but (b) exceptions thrown from that code bypass any surrounding >> `try`/`catch` blocks, and instead reach `window.onerror`. > >Uh... Sure there is. It's as simple as a function that catches the >exception and then calls window.onerror, no? That may end up having different behavior when it comes to stack traces and debugger behavior. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 18:01:03 UTC