W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: [futures] Making ProgressFuture immediate

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:13:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDA3VFctriUUct4GUK1mEtzsO6NQxa_dhDTfDueKqzKegw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> wrote:
> On 12/04/13 01:05, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> I propose that we change it so that, if at least one progress update
>> has already been made and the future isn't yet resolved, the progress
>> callback is immediately (next tick) called with the most recent
>> progress value.  That way the progress updates also act kinda like
>> futures in general, which is nice.
> I guess it would be good to have the callback being called synchronously
> in that case maybe (assuming ProgressFuture specification re-uses the
> synchronous flag).

I don't think it should run synch.  It's important, to keep reasoning
about Futures sane, that everything run consistently async.

> Also, I think we should call .progress() such as .then() when the
> ProgressFuture is done.

Hmm, maybe.  I'm not sure.

Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 17:13:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:20 UTC