W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: [DOM3Events] Comments on DOM Level 3 key events

From: Hallvord R. M. Steen <hallvord@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:10:14 +0200
To: www-dom@w3.org, "Mounir Lamouri" <mounir@lamouri.fr>
Cc: "Ojan Vafai" <ojan@chromium.org>
Message-ID: <op.wmrx7co5a3v5gv@hr-desk>
Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> skreiv Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:50:55 +0200

> So Opera would agree with Mozilla to have an attribute on the
> KeyboardEvent interface that represents the physical key that has been
> pressed?

Yes, generally I think we see the use cases for that, but the devil is in  
the details and it's not clear to me from what you say below what use case  
you're actually trying to fulfil here:

> However, I think we should use a new attribute instead of 'key'.
> Otherwise, on my laptop, it would be hard to know what this would be  
> doing:
> { char: '', key: 'Home' }
> it could be the 'Home' key or the 'BrightnessUp' depending on my
> pressing 'Fn' or not.

But this has nothing to do with identifying the "physical key". The  
"key:Home" property does a pretty good job at that (if we spec it like I  
think we agree we should, i.e. disregarding modifier keys - that  
presumably includes Fn).

Here you seem to be looking for a way to determine what the key would do  
if the script did not interfere, sort of like an event.nativeShortcut  
property. That seems like a very different use case to me.

In general, the OS or platform will always be able to filter out and  
respond to some keypresses, like Fn+function keys or ctrl-alt-delete, we  
probably can't demand that a web app should be able to respond to  
absolutely every key combination.


> Generally speaking, as long as modifiers happen in keys without a char
> representation, 'key' would be the only way to know what's the final
> value so to know the actual physical key value, we will need a new
> attribute.

I'm still confused because you seem to conflate they key's physical  
position with its intended action - what exactly do you mean by "physical  
key value"?

Apologies if we're talking past each other, you can take comfort in the  
fact that if we are, I'm probably making a fool of myself in public. ;-)

-- 
Hallvord R. M. Steen
Core tester, Opera Software
Received on Friday, 26 October 2012 07:10:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 26 October 2012 07:10:57 GMT