W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: "DOM4 Events" Proposal (was: Spec proposals for Event constructors)

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:18:16 +0100
To: "Kentaro Hara" <haraken@chromium.org>
Cc: "Alex Russell" <slightlyoff@chromium.org>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Jacob Rossi" <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "schepers@w3.org" <schepers@w3.org>, "Dominic Cooney" <dominicc@chromium.org>, "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <op.v8qj4qr0idj3kv@simon-pieterss-macbook.local>
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:54:59 +0100, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:18:04 +0100, Kentaro Hara <haraken@chromium.org>  
> wrote:
>
>>> One of the ideas with event constructors was not only to introduce the
>>> constructor, but also to get rid of init*Event() methods where  
>>> possible. So
>>> ideally, e.g. the WheelEvent interface would not have the legacy  
>>> method,
>>> since it's (I assume) not needed for compat with existing content.
>>
>> Yes, we should remove init*Event() from the spec IDL. We can just note
>> "Note: As events have constructors, initEvent() is superfluous.
>> However, it has to be supported for legacy content.", just like the
>> spec of Event (http://www.w3.org/TR/dom/#interface-event).
>
> Those two options are mutually exclusive. Either initFooEvent() is not  
> needed for compat, and should be removed completely (like e.g.  
> initProgressEvent() http://www.w3.org/TR/progress-events/#progressevent  
> ), or it is needed for compat, and should be kept, like initEvent() in  
> DOM4.
>
> A guess is that initUIEvent and initMouseEvent are needed for compat,  
> and the rest aren't.

http://koders.com/ (with language set to JavaScript)

inituievent            352
initmouseevent       3,405
initkeyboardevent        7
initwheelevent           0
inittextevent            0
initcompositionevent     0
initfocusevent           0


>
>> Jacob: Would you please update the "..." parts in the IDL in the spec
>> draft? I think we can copy IDL attributes from the DOM3 event specs.
>


-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 09:19:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:09 GMT