On Jun 08, 2007, at 15:35, Norman Walsh wrote: > / Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> was heard to say: > | No, the Java bindings are automatically generated from the > specification > | source code, which only documents attributes as attributes, not > as indi- > | vidual methods. For attributes that are read/write you inevitably > get in > | some cases odd documentation. I don't think it is feasible to > write two > | versions of the text for all such attributes, and I don't see an > easy > | way to automatically generate more suitable text. > > That's unfortunate. I wonder if it would be possible to add an > explanation of the problem to the description of the class at the top > of the file? At least that way readers would know it was intentional > and not a documentation bug. Java still doesn't support accessors? I'd file that as a bug against Java 1/2:-) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "It can hardly be a coincidence that no language on Earth has ever produced the phrase, 'as pretty as an airport.' Airports are ugly. Some are very ugly. Some attain a degree of ugliness that can only be the result of a special effort." -- Douglas AdamsReceived on Monday, 11 June 2007 15:07:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:24:59 GMT